Token Standards Explained (ERC-20, ERC-3643, ERC-1400)
Token Standards Explained (ERC-20, ERC-3643, ERC-1400)
Token standards explained in plain terms - how ERC-20, ERC-3643, and ERC-1400 differ, and which one a compliant real-world asset security token needs.
Token standards explained in plain terms - how ERC-20, ERC-3643, and ERC-1400 differ, and which one a compliant real-world asset security token needs.
A token standard is a shared rulebook that defines how a token behaves on a blockchain - how it is transferred, counted, and read by wallets and apps. ERC-20 is the base standard for ordinary fungible tokens; ERC-3643 and ERC-1400 extend it for regulated securities that must control who can hold them. For a real-world asset that is a security, a plain ERC-20 is not enough, because it cannot enforce the rules securities law requires.
Key takeaways
- A token standard is a common interface so any wallet, exchange, or contract can work with a token without custom code.
- ERC-20 is the base fungible standard - simple, universal, and permissionless, which is exactly why it is wrong for a regulated security on its own.
- ERC-3643 and ERC-1400 build compliance into the token: only approved identities can hold it, and transfers can be restricted at the protocol level.
- The right standard follows the asset: utility and payment tokens use ERC-20; tokenized securities use a permissioned standard.
What is a token standard, and why does it exist?
A token standard is a set of functions a token agrees to expose - "transfer this amount," "report this balance," "approve this spender." Because every compliant token answers the same calls, a wallet or exchange can support thousands of tokens without writing code for each one. The standard is the reason you can hold many different tokens in a single wallet.
Most standards are "ERC" numbers - Ethereum Request for Comments - the proposals that the Ethereum community adopts as conventions. They are not laws; they are agreements. A token that follows ERC-20 will "just work" with the enormous ecosystem built around it, which is both ERC-20's great strength and, for securities, its problem.
ERC-20 - the base layer
ERC-20 is the standard almost everyone means by "a token." It defines fungible tokens - each unit identical and interchangeable - and powers most stablecoins and on-chain currencies. It is simple, battle-tested, and supported everywhere.
It is also permissionless by design: anyone can receive an ERC-20, and transfers cannot be blocked by the issuer. That is perfect for a currency and disqualifying for a regulated security, which by law may only be held by eligible, identity-verified investors. You can bolt controls onto an ERC-20, but the base standard has no concept of "who is allowed to hold this."
ERC-3643 and ERC-1400 - standards for securities
Two standards add that missing layer. The table shows how they compare to the base.
| ERC-20 | ERC-3643 | ERC-1400 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Built for | Fungible tokens | Permissioned securities | Security-token suite |
| Who can hold it | Anyone | Verified identities only | Approved holders only |
| Transfer restrictions | — No | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Share classes / partitions | — No | — No | ✓ Yes |
| Forced transfer (court / regulator) | — No | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Typical RWA use | Stablecoins, payments | Compliant security tokens | Multi-class securities |
ERC-3643, often called T-REX, builds permissioning in through on-chain identity. Each holder has a verified identity credential, and a compliance module checks every transfer against the rules before it can settle - so an unapproved wallet simply cannot receive the token. It is a focused standard for permissioned, compliant security tokens.
ERC-1400 is a broader suite of security-token standards. Its signature feature is partitions: a single token can be split into tranches - say, locked versus freely transferable, or different share classes - each with its own rules, plus hooks for attaching legal documents and forcing transfers when a regulator or court requires. Both standards share the core idea: a transfer restriction enforced by the protocol, usually backed by a whitelist of approved wallets.
Which standard does an RWA need?
Match the standard to the asset. A payment or utility token uses ERC-20. A tokenized security - fractional real estate, a credit fund, a tokenized Treasury - needs a permissioned standard so the token can enforce eligibility and transfer rules itself, rather than relying on a registrar to catch violations after the fact.
The choice is not only technical. A standard that supports fractional ownership with built-in compliance lets a deal onboard many small investors while staying inside securities law automatically. As of 2026, ERC-3643 and ERC-1400 are the two most common choices for serious RWA security tokens, and which one fits depends on whether the deal needs multiple share classes and forced-transfer powers, or a single clean permissioned class.
Where to go next
- Next: the tokenized asset lifecycle - how these tokens live from issuance to redemption.
- The builder's side: choosing a token standard for your offering.
- Glossary: security token.
Sources: ethereum.org (EIP registry); ERC-3643 Association, as of 2026.
Frequently asked questions
Can I just use ERC-20 for a tokenized security?
Not safely. ERC-20 has no built-in way to restrict who holds a token, which securities law requires. You can layer controls on top, but a purpose-built standard like ERC-3643 or ERC-1400 enforces eligibility and transfer rules at the protocol level, which is far more robust.
What is the difference between ERC-3643 and ERC-1400?
ERC-3643 (T-REX) is a focused standard for permissioned security tokens using on-chain identity and a compliance module. ERC-1400 is a broader suite that adds partitions - multiple tranches or share classes in one token - and document and forced-transfer hooks. ERC-1400 is more flexible; ERC-3643 is more standardized.
Are token standards the same across every blockchain?
The ERC standards are Ethereum conventions, and chains compatible with the Ethereum Virtual Machine reuse them. Other blockchains have their own equivalents, but the concepts - fungible base tokens versus permissioned security tokens - carry across.
Does the token standard affect my rights as an investor?
Indirectly. The standard enforces on-chain rules like who can hold or transfer the token, but your actual rights - to income, voting, or sale proceeds - come from the legal documents behind the deal, not the code. The standard helps enforce them; it does not create them.
Educational content, not financial or legal advice. Tokenized assets carry risk; do your own research and consult a professional before investing.

Written by
Alex BerezhnykCo-founder, CTO · Co-founder & CTO, Unicorn Invest
Seasoned blockchain and web2 developer with entrepreneurship and investing experience, building Unicorn Invest's on-chain tokenization infrastructure.
Related Content
How Asset Tokenization Works (Step by Step)
How does asset tokenization work? Follow the full process step by step - asset, SPV, smart contract, investor checks, minting, and on-chain distributions.
The Lifecycle of a Tokenized Asset
The tokenized asset lifecycle stage by stage - issuance, distribution, secondary trading, and redemption - what happens on-chain at each step and why.
What Is a Smart Contract? (for Non-Coders)
What is a smart contract? It is self-running code on a blockchain that enforces rules automatically - here is how it works and why RWA tokens depend on it.
choosing a token standard
Token Standard
Glossary definition
Test your knowledge
Evaluate your RWA & tokenisation skills with our quests.
Pass 80% of all quests (7 of 8) to unlock your RWA Certificate.
RWA Foundations
The core ideas behind real-world-asset tokenization - wallets, stablecoins, custody, and what a token actually represents.
8 questions · 24 pts
Investor Essentials
What an investor needs before buying tokenized assets - accreditation rules, and how safe tokenized Treasuries really are.
8 questions · 48 pts
Builder's Path
Structuring and compliance for issuers - 506(c) accreditation verification and choosing the right LLC for your SPV.
8 questions · 57 pts
Get new RWA guides by email
Occasional updates when we publish new lessons. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.