Skip to content
Foundations · Intermediate

Token Standards Explained (ERC-20, ERC-3643, ERC-1400)

4 min read

Token standards explained in plain terms - how ERC-20, ERC-3643, and ERC-1400 differ, and which one a compliant real-world asset security token needs.

Alex BerezhnykUpdated November 9, 2026

A token standard is a shared rulebook that defines how a token behaves on a blockchain - how it is transferred, counted, and read by wallets and apps. ERC-20 is the base standard for ordinary fungible tokens; ERC-3643 and ERC-1400 extend it for regulated securities that must control who can hold them. For a real-world asset that is a security, a plain ERC-20 is not enough, because it cannot enforce the rules securities law requires.

Key takeaways

  • A token standard is a common interface so any wallet, exchange, or contract can work with a token without custom code.
  • ERC-20 is the base fungible standard - simple, universal, and permissionless, which is exactly why it is wrong for a regulated security on its own.
  • ERC-3643 and ERC-1400 build compliance into the token: only approved identities can hold it, and transfers can be restricted at the protocol level.
  • The right standard follows the asset: utility and payment tokens use ERC-20; tokenized securities use a permissioned standard.

What is a token standard, and why does it exist?

A token standard is a set of functions a token agrees to expose - "transfer this amount," "report this balance," "approve this spender." Because every compliant token answers the same calls, a wallet or exchange can support thousands of tokens without writing code for each one. The standard is the reason you can hold many different tokens in a single wallet.

Most standards are "ERC" numbers - Ethereum Request for Comments - the proposals that the Ethereum community adopts as conventions. They are not laws; they are agreements. A token that follows ERC-20 will "just work" with the enormous ecosystem built around it, which is both ERC-20's great strength and, for securities, its problem.

ERC-20 - the base layer

ERC-20 is the standard almost everyone means by "a token." It defines fungible tokens - each unit identical and interchangeable - and powers most stablecoins and on-chain currencies. It is simple, battle-tested, and supported everywhere.

It is also permissionless by design: anyone can receive an ERC-20, and transfers cannot be blocked by the issuer. That is perfect for a currency and disqualifying for a regulated security, which by law may only be held by eligible, identity-verified investors. You can bolt controls onto an ERC-20, but the base standard has no concept of "who is allowed to hold this."

ERC-3643 and ERC-1400 - standards for securities

Two standards add that missing layer. The table shows how they compare to the base.

ERC-20ERC-3643ERC-1400
Built forFungible tokensPermissioned securitiesSecurity-token suite
Who can hold itAnyoneVerified identities onlyApproved holders only
Transfer restrictions— No✓ Yes✓ Yes
Share classes / partitions— No— No✓ Yes
Forced transfer (court / regulator)— No✓ Yes✓ Yes
Typical RWA useStablecoins, paymentsCompliant security tokensMulti-class securities
How the base fungible standard compares to the two main security-token standards.

ERC-3643, often called T-REX, builds permissioning in through on-chain identity. Each holder has a verified identity credential, and a compliance module checks every transfer against the rules before it can settle - so an unapproved wallet simply cannot receive the token. It is a focused standard for permissioned, compliant security tokens.

ERC-1400 is a broader suite of security-token standards. Its signature feature is partitions: a single token can be split into tranches - say, locked versus freely transferable, or different share classes - each with its own rules, plus hooks for attaching legal documents and forcing transfers when a regulator or court requires. Both standards share the core idea: a transfer restriction enforced by the protocol, usually backed by a whitelist of approved wallets.

Which standard does an RWA need?

Match the standard to the asset. A payment or utility token uses ERC-20. A tokenized security - fractional real estate, a credit fund, a tokenized Treasury - needs a permissioned standard so the token can enforce eligibility and transfer rules itself, rather than relying on a registrar to catch violations after the fact.

The choice is not only technical. A standard that supports fractional ownership with built-in compliance lets a deal onboard many small investors while staying inside securities law automatically. As of 2026, ERC-3643 and ERC-1400 are the two most common choices for serious RWA security tokens, and which one fits depends on whether the deal needs multiple share classes and forced-transfer powers, or a single clean permissioned class.

Where to go next

Sources: ethereum.org (EIP registry); ERC-3643 Association, as of 2026.

Frequently asked questions

Can I just use ERC-20 for a tokenized security?

Not safely. ERC-20 has no built-in way to restrict who holds a token, which securities law requires. You can layer controls on top, but a purpose-built standard like ERC-3643 or ERC-1400 enforces eligibility and transfer rules at the protocol level, which is far more robust.

What is the difference between ERC-3643 and ERC-1400?

ERC-3643 (T-REX) is a focused standard for permissioned security tokens using on-chain identity and a compliance module. ERC-1400 is a broader suite that adds partitions - multiple tranches or share classes in one token - and document and forced-transfer hooks. ERC-1400 is more flexible; ERC-3643 is more standardized.

Are token standards the same across every blockchain?

The ERC standards are Ethereum conventions, and chains compatible with the Ethereum Virtual Machine reuse them. Other blockchains have their own equivalents, but the concepts - fungible base tokens versus permissioned security tokens - carry across.

Does the token standard affect my rights as an investor?

Indirectly. The standard enforces on-chain rules like who can hold or transfer the token, but your actual rights - to income, voting, or sale proceeds - come from the legal documents behind the deal, not the code. The standard helps enforce them; it does not create them.

Educational content, not financial or legal advice. Tokenized assets carry risk; do your own research and consult a professional before investing.

Alex Berezhnyk

Written by

Alex Berezhnyk

Co-founder, CTO · Co-founder & CTO, Unicorn Invest

Seasoned blockchain and web2 developer with entrepreneurship and investing experience, building Unicorn Invest's on-chain tokenization infrastructure.

Share

Related Content

Test your knowledge

Evaluate your RWA & tokenisation skills with our quests.

0 of 8 passed0%

Pass 80% of all quests (7 of 8) to unlock your RWA Certificate.

All quests →

Get new RWA guides by email

Occasional updates when we publish new lessons. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.